And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest,
And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if any be found of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem.
And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:
And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
And he said, Who are thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks (Acts 9:1-5).
(Since God already knew how these religious leaders would react, some may be inclined to wonder why God would open the heavens and reveal His Glory and His Son after this fashion, intimating the possibility of something occurring which God already knew couldn't occur. And, beyond that, God already had Saul standing by to be introduced at the time of Israel's climactic rejection, with a view to the progression of events throughout the remainder of the dispensation going in a completely different direction, though the reoffer of the kingdom continued to remain open to Israel.
The outworking of God's plans and purposes in the preceding respect can best be understood in the light of the overall offer of the kingdom of the heavens to Israel. Preceding Calvary there was an offer of the kingdom, and following Calvary there was a reoffer of the kingdom. And the nation couldn't possibly have accepted the offer at either time, which God, in His omniscience, knew beforehand.
But, even though Israel couldn't possibly have accepted the offer in either instance, a bona fide offer was made in both instances. And even following Stephen's death the same bona fide offer remained open throughout the time covered by the remainder of the book, though things within God's plans and purposes were then moving in an entirely different direction.
Thus, when the heavens were opened at the termination of Stephen's message -- with the Glory visible and Jesus seen standing -- there was a bona fide movement within the Godhead in heaven relative to the possibility of Israel repenting. Such a movement was in complete keeping with the way things had been done during the original offer and during the reoffer of the kingdom. And this was done [as other things had been done before] even though God knew [as at any time before] that the nation wouldn't repent.
This is simply the manner in which God is seen revealing Himself in Scripture. And God even revealed Himself through Paul after this fashion very near the end of that period during which the reoffer of the kingdom remained open to Israel. When Paul wrote Romans [about 60 A.D.], he said, "For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh" [9:3]. Paul's desire to see Israel repent was so great that he was willing to himself be separated from Christ and His Glory if such could bring this to pass.
Even though things were going in a completely different direction at this time, with the door for Israel about to be closed, God had still left the door open to this degree. Paul and others, ministering out in the Gentile world, were still, in accord with Rom. 1:16, going "to the Jew first" in every city where their ministry carried them. This was in complete keeping with God's plans and purposes, though this was also with a view to something which couldn't happen. And, even though it couldn't happen, they ministered after a fashion expecting that it could, and possibly would, happen.
Again, this is simply the manner in which God is seen revealing Himself in Scripture. And it is not so much for man in his finite wisdom to understand as it is for man in his finite wisdom to believe.)
The conversion and subsequent ministry of Paul forms a dual type. One facet of the type is revealed at the outset of God's dealings with Paul in the Book of Acts, and the other facet of the type is revealed toward the end of Paul's ministry in his first letter to Timothy (Acts 9:1ff; I Tim. 1:15, 16).
The first type reflects back on Stephen's message, setting Paul forth as a type within the framework of that which Stephen had called
attention to through drawing from several different types; and the second type reflects back on Paul's ministry, setting Paul forth as a type within the framework of his calling.
And only an omniscient God -- One able to see the future as well as He could see the past and present -- could take a man such as Paul and, from his experiences and actions, establish a dual type of this nature.
But this is only a very minute part of the typical structure of Scripture. God, throughout His Word, beginning with Adam, has taken individuals, and, within the framework of His omniscience and sovereignty, has brought things to pass within their lives after such a fashion that He could later use these things to teach His people great spiritual truths. And the experiences of these individuals, forming types, must present teachings which are completely harmonious, one with the other.
The Word of God, in this respect, has been structured after an intricate, detailed fashion which defies all human understanding. It is spiritual in its structure, given by the infinite God, through the Spirit, and totally beyond finite, human comprehension; and it must be interpreted by the Spirit Who gave it, as He takes spiritual things one place and compares them with spiritual things at another place.
Anyone, saved or unsaved, can see the "letter" of Scripture. But only a saved person who allows the indwelling Holy Spirit to lead him "into all truth" can possess the type spiritual perception which will allow him to move from the "letter" to the "spirit" of the Word, correctly viewing that which is spiritual.
Scripture must be compared with Scripture, under the leadership of the Spirit of God. The Spirit, Who gave the Word, must be allowed to open this Word to a Christian's understanding through "comparing spiritual things with spiritual" (cf. John 16:13-15; I Cor. 2:9-3:2).
And one form of the spiritual manner in which the Word has been given can be seen in Paul's conversion and subsequent ministry. Paul's conversion followed Stephen extensively dealing with various types (forming one overall type) from the Old Testament, in relation to the message concerning the kingdom and Israel; and Paul's conversion preceded that which God was about to do within His plans and purposes, in relation to the message concerning the kingdom and the
Gentiles.
And, in keeping with the timing and reason for Paul's conversion, God, as He brought matters to pass, did two things: 1) He, through Paul's conversion, formed one type by reflecting back on that which Stephen had brought out in his message; and 2) He, through Paul's calling, would form another type by reflecting on things which were about to occur within the framework of His plans and purposes. The first type was in relation to Israel, and the second would be in relation to Christians.
1. In Relation to Israel
Stephen, during the course of his message, began with God's promise to Abraham and ended with God's fulfillment of this promise during Solomon's day (though the complete fulfillment is seen, not in the type through activities brought to pass in Solomon's day, but in the antitype through activities which will be brought to pass in that coming day following Christ's return). But Stephen also dealt with other types lying between these two points in his complete message, types which carry a person to the same goal, to the Messianic Kingdom. He dealt extensively with the experiences of Joseph; and then he also dealt extensively with the experiences of Moses, leading into those of his successor, Joshua.
That which had just occurred in Israel -- the rejection of Israel's Messiah -- was set forth in the experiences of both Joseph and Moses. And that set forth in the experiences of Solomon, concluding Stephen's message, was also previously set forth in additional experiences of both Joseph and Moses -- experiences following the time of their acceptance by their brethren (concluded, in Moses' case, with the experiences of his successor, Joshua).
Then, when God began to deal with Paul, He set forth these same concluding truths again within the framework of Paul's conversion. God, through Paul's conversion, set forth once again a type of Israel's future conversion. Even though Israel had rejected that which had been set forth several different ways in Stephen's message (blessings to follow the rejection and sufferings, associated with Israel's future conversion), God set the matter forth once again in the person through whom He was now about to deal because of Israel's rejection.
God, because of Israel's rejection, turned to Paul, the man whom He had chosen to carry the message surrounding the kingdom to the Gentiles. But in Paul's very conversion, God showed the end of that to which Stephen had referred, though an entire dispensation lasting approximately 2,000 years would elapse before these things could occur. In the very conversion of the man whom God had chosen as the apostle to the Gentiles (with a view to Israel being set aside for the remainder of the dispensation), God showed the end of the matter in relation to Israel. God showed exactly what would happen to Israel at the end of the present dispensation, exactly as Stephen had shown the Jewish council, exactly as the Old Testament prophets had foretold.
Paul was saved through Christ's personal appearance, through Christ personally revealing Himself to him. This same type was previously seen through both Joseph revealing himself to his brethren a second time (Gen. 45:1ff) and Moses revealing himself to his brethren a second time (Ex. 4:19ff). And all three types point to that coming day when Christ will reveal Himself to His brethren a second time (Zech. 12:10-14; 13:6-9; Rev. 1:7).
Paul, in the type, was saved as the apostle to the Gentiles, the one who would carry the message concerning the King and His kingdom to all the Gentile nations. And, in the antitype, this is exactly what will occur following Israel's national conversion. Israel, in accord with the nation's calling, will carry God's message to all the Gentile nations.
The Jewish people will carry the identical message which Joseph's brothers carried in the type, following Joseph's revelation to them -- "Joseph is yet alive, and he is governor over all the land of Egypt" (Gen. 45:26). Carried over into the antitype that would read, "Jesus is yet alive, and He is Governor over all the earth."
And they will carry the identical message which Moses' brethren were to carry following his second appearance to them. Once they had been established in the land, within a theocracy, they, in fulfillment of their calling (Isa. 43:1-10), were to carry God's message to the Gentile nations of the earth.
Exactly when will all this occur? God revealed once again, immediately following Paul's conversion, the answer. It will occur after two days, on the third day (Acts 9:9).
(The exact wording of Acts 9:9 states that Paul was without sight for "three days." But note the exact wording of several other related texts. Jonah was in the belly of the fish "three days and three nights," as Christ was in "the heart of the earth" this same length of time [Jonah 1:17; Matt. 12:40]. Christ though, as Israel will be yet future, was raised "on the third day" [Matt. 16:21; 17:22, 23; 20:17-19; Luke 24:21, 46], which means that Jonah [a type of both Christ and Israel] had to also be raised on the third day.
Both Hosea in the Old Testament and John in the New reveal that Israel's blindness will be lifted [synonymous with Israel, as Jonah, being removed from the place of death] after two days, on the third day [Hosea 5:15-6:2; John 11:6, 7, 43, 44; cf. Rom. 11:25, 26; II Cor. 3:14-16].
Thus, when dealing with Paul as a type, the same thing must be said relative to the length of time Paul remained blind, with his sight then being restored. As a type of Israel, he was blind for three days, with his sight then being restored [Jonah 1:17]; but also, as a type of Israel, it was after two days, on the third day that his sight was restored [Hosea 5:15-6:2].
Viewing "three days" and "on the third day" as synonymous after this fashion is in complete keeping with the way God has established matters in the Old Testament and carried them over into the New [cf. Gen. 40:13, 20; I Sam. 30:12, 13; II Chron. 10:5, 12; Esther 4:16; 5:1; Jonah 1:17; Matt. 12:40]. Only through reckoning time within a given sequence of days, as God has established time, can statements that Christ was raised "on the third day" be reconciled with statements that He was raised "after three days" [cf. Matt. 27:63; Mark 8:31; Luke 24:7, 21, 46; I Cor. 15:4]. And the same statements are seen in Scripture relative to Israel's future restoration as well.)
(Ref. Chapter I, "Continuing from the Gospels," for a discussion of the Greek words pimplemi and pleroo in relation to Joel's prophecy and Christians today.)
"This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief. Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting" (I Tim. 1:15, 16).
"I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith. Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing" (II Tim. 4:7, 8).
Paul was saved to carry the message which Israel had rejected to Christians throughout the Gentile world (though there were no Christians in the Gentile world at that time). The message had gone to the Samaritans at the time of the dispersion following Stephen's death (Acts 8:5), but this message was carried to the Gentiles only following Paul's conversion.
Those in the household of Cornelius were the first Gentiles to hear the message, though this message came from Peter's lips rather than from Paul's (Acts 10:34-48). But Peter, within the next three chapters of the book (chs. 11-13), would gradually be replaced by Paul as the central person through whom God would carry out His plans and purposes in the early Church. "The gospel of the circumcision" had been committed to Peter; but now Paul had been called forth to carry the gospel to the "uncircumcised" (Gal. 2:7; cf. Acts 9:15; 26:13-20; Rom. 11:13). Thus, there is a transition in central personages, from Peter to Paul, at this point in the book.
(It is often taught that the eunuch from Ethiopia in Acts, chapter eight was a Gentile from that part of the world. However, this cannot be correct, for the message was not carried beyond Samaria, to the Gentiles, until later [in ch. 10].1. Because of Israel's Rejection
The eunuch in chapter eight, to whom Philip proclaimed truths concerning Christ from Isaiah, chapter fifty-three, could only have been a Jew living in Ethiopia who had been to Jerusalem to worship [as those Jews from "every nation under heaven" on the day of Pentecost in the second chapter of the book].)
